davidlfxu wrote:
剑兄:你先开个头,如何?
孤独剑 wrote:
我们再来看看老外是怎么说的:英文好的帮忙翻译一下
This phone's broken!
This is my new cell phone (See photo a). When I first got it, an instruction sheet in the box said to completely charge the battery before turning on the phone. I charged it up all day. When I tried to turn it on, I pressed the P button on the top right side of the phone (See arrow in photo b). I thought P was for Power.
When I pressed the P button, the phone didn't turn on. I tried it several times and then started pressing various buttons on the front of the phone. Nothing turned the phone on. Was the battery charged up enough? I charged it for several more hours and tried it again, but still no luck. I called customer service and they told me to send the phone back. Several days later, I got a new phone. Exactly the same thing happened with the new phone!
While complaining about the phone, I showed it to our Nanny. She turned the phone on right away by pressing the red "End call" button (See arrow in photo c). Her cell phone worked the same way! Looking closely at the button, one can not easily see the tiny on/off symbol. The red "End call" button has to be pressed and held down for a few seconds to turn the phone on and off.
I have shown this phone to several people and each had difficulty figuring out how to turn it on. These people all had exactly the same problem I had. All were Nokia cell phone users and on Nokia phones, the on/off button is located at the top of the phone. I'll bet the cell phone company is getting a lot of unnecessary customer calls like mine.
This phone has several usability problems. The P button, which many people expect to turn on the phone, does not turn on the phone. The P button is actually a short cut to a menu of information services such as sports scores and stock market prices. Most people don't expect the red "End call" button to turn on the phone. The on/off symbol on the red "End call" button is too small to be easily noticeable.
Design suggestion
Here are some potential solutions to this problem:
1、Change the function of the P button so that it turns the phone on and off. This would be easily recognized by Nokia users.
2、Alternatively, provide more obvious labeling for the "End-call" button's on/off function. For example, put a larger on/off symbol outside the button.
3、Put a temporary sticker on the phone such as "ress and hold this button to turn the phone on and off." This would solve the problem for the first time user.
davidlfxu wrote:
将这个翻译后有分加吗?
翻译正确可加一分---alexsung
davidlfxu wrote:
本来是讲着玩玩,版主当真了,我只好硬着头皮试试,翻译不好,
大家出来指正吧!
这是我的新手机,当我第一次买他时,盒子里的说明书讲在开启手机时要将电池充满电,我充了整天,我
试图开启手机时,我按住右侧上方的按钮P(如图B所指的箭头),我以为P是电源开关。
我按这个P按钮,手机没有打开,我按了几次,然后去按手机前面板上其他不同的按钮,没有哪个键能将手机打开,电源充电不足够吗?我又充了几个小时且再一次试试,仍然没有开启。我打电话给客服中心,他们要我将手机返回给他们,几天后,我拿到了一个新的手机,又发生了同样的事情。
当我在抱怨其手机时,我把它演示给家里的保母,他(应为她)马上通过按 “End call ”就将手机打开了,(如图C所示)。她的手机也是同样方式操作的,仔细地看看这个键,一个人不可能很容易明白这个小的开关符号,必须按住且保持这个红色的 “End call ”键几秒才能去开机和关机。
我将这个电话出示给其他几个人,每一个人很难明白如何去开启手机,这些人都遇到和我同样的问题。所有诺基亚的用户,如开关键都如此,我打赌手机公司将获得象我这样的多余客户。他们全部都是诺基亚的用户,而诺基亚手机开关机键是在手机顶上。我打赌手机公司一定正接到很多象我一样的电话投诉。
这个手机有几个使用性的问题,许多人认为其是一个开启手机“P ”键却不能打开手机,实际上“P ”键是一个诸如运动分数和股市价格信息服务菜单的简写。其二是大多数人不期望的红色的“End call ”键打开手机,这个开关符号在红色的“End call ”键上太小了以致不容易引起注意啊!
设计建议:
1:改变的P键的功能以便手机的开与关,这将使诺基亚用户很容易被认出来。 (将开关机功能转到P键上,这会使诺基亚用户易于识别。)
2:另一种选择方式,为“End call ”键提供一张意思明显得多的标签,例如,放在一张较大的开关符号在这个键的外面。为“End call ”键 的开关机功能提供更明显的标识, 例如,在键外加大的开/关符号。
3:贴一张临时的不干胶纸,印上“按住且保持这个键以使开启和关手机”,这将解决用户第一次使用时的麻烦。
davidlfxu wrote:
谢谢,derech指教,建议竹斑加分啊!
孤独剑 wrote:
A friend told me he was confused by the switches on his coffee maker (See photo.) Each switch has a light on it. The top switch turns the coffee maker on and off. When it is on, its light goes on. No light appears when the coffee maker is off.
The bottom switch selects the quantity of coffee desired, either a) the smaller quantity of 3 or fewer cups or b) the larger quantity of 4 or more cups. The problem is with the light on this bottom switch. When would you expect the switch light to go on, for the smaller quantity or for the larger quantity?
If you said that the light goes on when the switch is set to the larger quantity of 4 or more cups, you would be wrong. The quantity light ONLY goes on for the smaller quantity, three cups or less. It does NOT go on for the larger quantity, 4 or more cups.
Why is this confusing? People naturally expect more coffee to be associated with more light (light on) and less coffee to be associated with less light (light off).
Design Suggestions
Change the operation of the coffee quantity switch so that the light goes on when the coffee quantity is set to make more cups of coffee, not fewer cups. This change would involve switching the positions of the "min...3" and "4...max" labels.
Remove the light from the coffee quantity switch.
Consider removing the coffee quantity switch entirely. Most coffee makers don't have one.
mjdrain wrote:
这种应该是设计上的失误。毕竟设计者们只是根据自己的经验或习惯来进行设计的,并不象些商业活动要进行评估或调查。这就要求我们在平时能注意一些使用的便利,和大家的惯例,在设计时要兼顾到很多。
很可惜的是,在国内真正搞设计的不是很多,都是抄些国外的新款,拼凑出来了我们的产品!!
国外的产品存在着这些失误的地方。我们存在的失误的地方更多!!
xyang97121129 wrote:
a&c沒有什么差別﹐只是c在裝配合后﹐很容易從外面看到里的東西(特別是當這附近有發光體)﹗﹗
b不知別一面是什么結構﹐但不管怎樣就強度而言﹐b是這當中最好的﹐但是要克服縮水問題﹐必須跑內側抽芯,相對模具費用較高。
我偏向于用c!!!
fireblue wrote:
用B的比较多,西门子上的手机经常有看见!
背后可以设计成向前凹防止缩水!
dinon wrote:
其实有八成以上的手机就是这样开关机的!它的作用是避免不小心的误操作及碰撞该按键所造成的意外开关机,所以用“时间”来判别是否“真假”开关机。这方法是非常简单有效,才得到众多手机厂家的应用!
版主所提倡的“独立开关健”及“贴告示”,我觉的不妥!理由是:
1.在打造一个精致及简洁至上的产品的时候,这些方法是与之相违背的。
2.完全可以把它是当作一个常识来认识,你看多少人都这么用过来!或者拿起说明书看一看!就象我们在window系统里打开一个文件,如果设定为“双击”,你就必须用鼠标点两下,单击就不行一样的道理!
image10 wrote:
我对此不是很了解,不过认为“A装配后容易看到内部”这一观点难以成立,因为此扣位的另一半扣上后,如果不是空心的,是实的,扣上后就看不到了嘛。
B、C 扣还有一个共同的缺点就是:当扣位扣起来时,有1,2两处的两个面与另一边的同样的地方有粗略的配合关系,一旦扣钩稍厚了一点,就会导致。另一半凸出。如果里面积满了污物或小砂子,也将导致此扣位失效。
而A扣就完全避免了这种问题。
至于从其它角度考虑,可能又是另一回事,所以看使用的场合不同而不同。
bbelemm wrote:
斑竹,我们公司给欧洲生产的手机,可都是跟你第一个图片差不多,开关可铃声开关都在面壳上,不在侧面哦.
孤独剑 wrote:
好呀,大家看看下面这个图片
bbelemm wrote:
发错了,重新开始
MANNING wrote:
关于扣位的方案,从美工线(0.5mm)考虑(我司的传统)A,B能看到漏空区,另外一个问题是(如别的网友已说)ESD比C方案区域大,在实际操作中这是非常头痛的问题(16K)!
B方案少了加强筋,令人担心跌落的问题。因为实际生产中纯原料是很少的,会掺很多水口料。
victorto wrote:
扣位,对每个机工再熟悉不过了,有谁可以分析出以下A.B.C.3种常见方案的优缺点.分析详尽的望版主给加分.
xuebiaowang wrote:
我认为只简单的给出A.B.C.三种卡位形式,而不给出其使用要求(如外观.强度等)和考虑产品与模具成本,是分不出优劣的.因为A.B.C.三种形式各有优点和劣点.
欢迎光临 iCAx开思网 (https://www.icax.org/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |