UG，catia， pro/E，哪个前景最看好？

PROE乃参数化及CPC(协同商务）之鼻祖！有眼不识泰山。不过UG有了I-DEAS我也很喜欢，毕竟参变量设计乃大势所趋嘛！！！！！！！
  
-------------------------------------------------------------

I am in North America. I care more about which one has more job oppertunities. In automative and aero industries, The Big Three use Catia, Ug and Ideas, and their suppliers have all of them but the old vertions, like  Catia V4. They don't want spend money if it still works. At next upgrade, Ford will switch to Catia, because EDC which belongs to GM bought SRDC-Ideas.
But it is hard to get a job in automative and aero industries, you backround is more important.  
Pro/e is used in platic molding in other industries.
Companies usually don't spend money to upgrad their software is it still works.  
For most of other companies other than OEM, In my observation, solidworks was more popular for the prople for first time update to 3D from AutoCAD. The reason is its cheaper and easy to learn.  
But in the near feature, Inventor may be much more popular for the small companies, if upgrad from Autocad, you just pay about 40K RMB.

不會吧我公司的二十四個開發工程師有二十三個用pro/e,只有一個人用ug,他為什麼用ug呢?ug對作加工中心比較理想.他原來是做模起家的.但pro/e做效果圖不好,我公司設計部的許多人都用ug做效果圖

nokia wrote:
这里论的是哪个前景最好，我个人认为那是以后的事，跟现在的软件功能没有绝对的联系，会搞功能不会搞市场的最后只能孤芳独赏，我觉得价格，服务，易用性，可塑性，服务，功能方面还有资源占用方面都要有过人之处才可以论前景。当然市场竞争最受惠的当然是在坐各位，可以想象我们五年后无论用什么软件，都会比现在好很多（这一点可以看回五年前的软件就明白了）。说到什么航天啊，TOYOTA啊，我觉得他们代表不了整个工业设计，我们的生活中毕竟还有很多东西用不同的软件做出来，甚至人手做出来。大家也知道一个产品的好与不好关键是设计意念，不是使用的软件。我万分希望这三个东东的前景都好，这样的竞争才会有进步，用户得到的东西才会更多。我们在做各位有前景是哪位？我认为绝对是设计意念超前，有无限创意的那位，绝对不是工兵型那些。

  
十分赞成nokia的观点，因为设计的基础不是软件使用，而是设计理念，软件是手段！！！

UG 建模曲面功都很不错，ugnx 2合并了I-dees  、测点功能又增强！！！ 只是草图功能不爽？！   
其实用软件关键在人的思路。

bmw wrote:
I am in North America. I care more about which one has more job oppertunities. In automative and aero industries, The Big Three use Catia, Ug and Ideas, and their suppliers have all of them but the old vertions, like  Catia V4. They don't want spend money if it still works. At next upgrade, Ford will switch to Catia, because EDC which belongs to GM bought SRDC-Ideas.  
  But it is hard to get a job in automative and aero industries, you backround is more important.   
  Pro/e is used in platic molding in other industries.  
  Companies usually don't spend money to upgrad their software is it still works.   
  For most of other companies other than OEM, In my observation, solidworks was more popular for the prople for first time update to 3D from AutoCAD. The reason is its cheaper and easy to learn.   
  But in the near feature, Inventor may be much more popular for the small companies, if upgrad from Autocad, you just pay about 40K RMB.

  
Thanks for your information.
  
Can you read the Chinese words?

我觉得要看不同的使用群，它们都有自已的独到之处。

如果Dassault公司不故意禁止SolidWorks能力无限提高，再让CATIA输出一些SolidWorks需要的技术给SolidWorks, SolidWorks前景最看好。我不喜欢CATIA满屏幕按钮图标，记不住。
  
我认为SolidWorks的下拉菜单＋常用命令图标化的界面最好。

那岂不是又跟PROE扯上关系?我看SOLDWORK是夹在中间,两面都不是人.