找回密码 注册 QQ登录
一站式解决方案

iCAx开思网

CAD/CAM/CAE/设计/模具 高清视频【积分说明】如何快速获得积分?快速3D打印 手板模型CNC加工服务在线3D打印服务,上传模型,自动报价
打印 上一主题 下一主题

国内UG和Pro/E的战争

[复制链接]
21
发表于 2007-6-7 10:42:20 | 只看该作者
2006
Market Share of the Largest NC Vendors at the Vendor Level

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册

x
22
发表于 2007-6-7 10:43:55 | 只看该作者
CNC
方面2006年
DS超UGS夺冠了
23
发表于 2007-6-7 10:46:23 | 只看该作者
CAM Software Market Leaders Named by CIMdata
ANN ARBOR, Michigan, June 5, 2007 — In the recently-released Version 16 of the NC Software and Related Services Market Assessment Report, CIMdata named the worldwide CAM software market leaders for 2006 and projected those expected to be market leaders in 2007. For 2006, Dassault Systèmes was the market leader on the basis of both vendor revenues received and end user payments, Planit Holdings was the leader on the basis of both industrial seats shipped and installed, and Planit Holdings was also named as the most rapidly-growing vendor.

Mr. Alan Christman, CIMdata Chairman and primary author of the report noted that, “Even though there have been a number of recent mergers and acquisitions, the CAM software market continues to be highly fragmented and competitive. There is no single vendor or small group of vendors that dominate the worldwide market. CIMdata tracks approximately 50 CAM software vendors and the rankings in the Report each list 20-30 vendors, depending upon the category.

For example, the 2006 leading vendors on the basis of CAM revenue received were Dassault Systèmes, UGS PLM Solutions, PTC, Delcam, Planit Holdings, NDES (formerly Hitachi Zosen Systems), Tebis Software, Missler Software, CNC Software, and Vero International. Dassault Systèmes and UGS PLM Solutions were the clear leaders with nearly identical revenues and a combined market share of 27.3%. The remaining eight vendors in the top 10 had a combined market share of 39.3% and the remainder of the vendors below the top 10 had a combined market share of 33.4%. This data is shown in the following chart.

2006
Market Share of the Largest NC Vendors at the Vendor Level


The 2006 top five vendors on the basis of CAM industrial seats shipped were Planit Holdings, CNC Software, UGS PLM Solutions, PTC, and Delcam. The seat count rankings are significantly different than the vendor revenue rankings. For example, CNC Software was listed as the number two vendor on the basis of industrial seats shipped, but only ninth largest on the basis of vendor revenue received. Conversely, Dassault Systèmes was the largest vendor on the basis of revenue received, but fell out of the top five on the basis of industrial seats shipped. The changes in rankings are primarily due to the differences in level and breadth of product and associated software pricing among the vendors.

The worldwide five most rapidly-growing CAM software vendors on the basis of revenue received in 2006 were Planit Holdings, Delcam, SolidCAM, Vero International, and TekSoft. Planit Holdings, Delcam, SolidCAM, and Vero International each achieved revenue growth in excess of 30% in 2006, as compared to 2005. However, it should be noted that recent acquisitions significantly impacted the growth at Planit Holdings, Delcam, and Vero International. Over the past five years, SolidCAM has been the consistent growth leader with annual growth rates in the 30% range. For 2007, CIMdata is projecting that the five most rapidly growing companies will be SolidCAM, TekSoft, Gibbs, OPEN MIND, and Delcam.

For the first time, CIMdata also did worldwide rankings based on brand name as well as by total vendor. In some cases, this made a significant difference as some vendors only offer products under one brand and some offer products under multiple brands. The multiple brands offered are typically the result of acquisitions. For example, the five largest brands for industrial seats shipped in 2006 were CNC Software Mastercam, PTC Pro/ENGINEER, Dassault Systèmes CATIA, UGS PLM Solutions NX, and NDES Space-E. As such, CNC Software Mastercam was the leading brand on the basis of industrial seats shipped, whereas Planit Holdings, the leader in total seats shipped, dropped out of the top five by brand, as their shipments were spread over four different brands.

Other vendor rankings contained in Version 16 of the NC Market Assessment Report include those for the education market, those based on revenue by geography and industry, those for verification and post processing vendors, the total number of people in a company, product development, and direct sales, and the number of resellers per company.
24
发表于 2007-6-9 09:06:23 | 只看该作者
deng ..............
25
发表于 2007-8-14 20:55:05 | 只看该作者
假如做一个特征,PROE是先选取所需图素、定义好所有的参数,再点OK,而且可以预览,如果不对,还可以立刻重新定义, proe大部分都是这样,只有少数如offset不是,而UG大部分时间只是next、next……,如果不对就只能back、back……   只有少数如 bridge curve才可以!可以预览的也不是很多。
  
  UG的基准平面和基准轴不能象PROE那样随着所作图素的大小自动缩放,尤其是基准轴那个箭头,太丰满了,简直是伤心虐目,建议吃点康尔寿!!
  
   哈哈,我连出三招,招招击中油鸡要害!!!
26
发表于 2007-8-14 21:01:23 | 只看该作者
不懂
27
发表于 2007-8-14 21:13:31 | 只看该作者
原帖由 qys6969 于 2007-8-14 20:55 发表
假如做一个特征,PROE是先选取所需图素、定义好所有的参数,再点OK,而且可以预览,如果不对,还可以立刻重新定义, proe大部分都是这样,只有少数如offset不是,而UG大部分时间只是next、next……,如果不对就只 ...


        问题是真正的UG高手从来不用参数化和草图,更别谈什么基准轴了。这点你从来不知道吧?从NX5的宣传资料就应该能看出(尽管NX5用的是OSD的宣传语,其实做的并不是那么回事)
28
发表于 2007-8-15 14:16:34 | 只看该作者
在一个大型装配图里勾有一个零件出来,我想知道这个零件在建模时用了多少个外部参照和被什么零件作了参照。有什么 办法?谁告诉我。
29
发表于 2007-8-15 17:22:24 | 只看该作者
原帖由 fjp0931 于 2007-8-14 21:13 发表


        问题是真正的UG高手从来不用参数化和草图,更别谈什么基准轴了。这点你从来不知道吧?从NX5的宣传资料就应该能看出(尽管NX5用的是OSD的宣传语,其实做的并不是那么回事)

又在鼓吹OSD了
30
发表于 2007-10-2 09:04:04 | 只看该作者
UG很好用
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

3D打印手板模型快速制作服务,在线报价下单!

QQ 咨询|手机版|联系我们|iCAx开思网  

GMT+8, 2024-12-29 02:03 , Processed in 0.025998 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, Redis On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.3

© 2002-2024 www.iCAx.org

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表